On the development of approaches to assessing the state of management in real technical systems
https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2026-1-41-47
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to develop additional capabilities of the cybernetics methodology for conducting numerical assessments and analyzing the state of management, control and safety of technical systems. The purpose of the study is to formulate and present elements of a methodology for analyzing quantitative patterns for ergatic systems, characteristics of projects of technical systems, equipment, devices, technologies for various fields of industry, nuclear energy, which can be used to describe their conditions, compare projected, planned or applied objects of study based on data from their technical specifications, passports and procedures., without using long-term experimental or operational data. The quantitative pattern analysis approach proposed on the basis of the ideal technical system model makes it possible to evaluate and analyze the advantages of innovative technologies, to make a comparative assessment of the state of management and safety of technical complexes, to form justifications for the preparation of optimal measures for programs and plans for the implementation of experimental and commercial technical projects, their control, modifications and upgrades, to develop recommendations for a comprehensive analysis in during the examinations. The features of the application of the equation of state hypothesis for the analysis of real technical systems are presented. The use of auxiliary approaches to evaluate the characteristics of technical systems allows for the development of reasoned management decisions based on a comprehensive analysis of a larger number of properties and quantities under consideration.
About the Author
D. I. Lobach
Minsk Gear Plant
Belarus
Belarus
Dmitry I. Lobach – PhD of Engineering.
Minsk
ResearcherID: HKN-7220-2023;
Author ID (РИНЦ): 1177269
References
1. Hubka V. Teoriya tehnicheskih sistem [Theory of technical systems]. Moscow: Mir; 1987. 208 p. (in Russian).
2. Kachala V.V. Osnovy teorii sistem i sistemnogo analiza. [Fundamentals of systems theory and system analysis]. Moscow: Goryachaya liniya – Telekom; 2012. 210 p. (in Russian).
3. Koleshko V.M., Gulaj A.V., Gulaj V.A. Znachenie faktora neopredelennosti celi v intellektnyh tehnologiyah nauchnogo poiska [The importance of the goal uncertainty factor in intelligent scientific research technologies]. Vestnik BNTU [Bulletin of the BNTU]. 2008;6:72–80 (in Russian). Available at: https://rep.bntu.by/handle/data/7390 (accessed 27 February 2026).
4. Kirillov N.P. Conceptual models and properties of technical systems with operated conditions (the review and the analysis). Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making. 2011;4:81–91 (in Russian). Available at: https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/iipr480 (accessed 27 February 2026).
5. Operational Safety Performance Indicators for Nuclear Power Plants. International Atomic Energy Agency. TECDOC;1141. Vienna: IAEA; 2000. 84 p. Available at: http://www.iaea.org/publications/5945/operational-safety-performance-indicators-for-nuclear-power-plants (accessed 27 February 2026).
6. Sharafutdinov R.B., Kuzneсov L.A., Bogdanova T.Yu. Ispol'zovanie sistem indikatorov bezopasnosti zarubezhnymi organami regulirovanija jadernoj i radiacionnoj bezopasnosti [The use of safety indicator systems by foreign regulatory bodies of nuclear and radiation safety]. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Journal. 2008;2:5–9 (in Russian). Available at: https://nrs-journal.ru/sections/articles/ispolzovanie-sistem-indikatorov-bezopasnosti-zarubezhnymiorganami-regulirovaniya-yadernoy-i-radiats/ (accessed 27 February 2026).
7. Khamaza A. Proposals on the implementation of risk-informed approach for control and supervision in the field of use atomic energy. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Journal. 2016;1:1–6 (in Russian). Available at: https://nrsjournal.ru/sections/articles/predlozheniya-po-vnedreniyu-risk-orientirovannogo-podkhoda-v-kontrolno-nadzornoydeyatelnosti-v-obla/ (accessed 27 February 2026).
8. Lobach D.I. On the development of approaches to assessing the technical systems safety. Cifra. Information technology and telecommunications. 2025;4(8) (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.60797/itech.2025.8.3.
9. Abramova V.N. Organizacionnja psihologija, organizacionnaja kul'tura i kul'tura bezopasnosti v atomnoj energetike [Organizational psychology, organizational culture and safety culture in atomic energy]. Part 1. Moscow; Obninsk: IG–SOCIN; 2009. 257 p. (in Russian).
10. Lobach D.I. On the hypothesis of the equation for technical system state. Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2024;51(4):112–122 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-4-112-122.
11. Lototsky V.L. Entropy and negentropy. Perspectives of Science & Education. International Scientific Electronic Journal. 2017;1(25):20–23 (in Russian). Available at: https://pnojournal.wordpress.com/archive/17-01/ (accessed 27 February 2026).
12. Lobach D.I. An ontological model of the dual nature of safety in technical systems. Ontology of designing. 2025;15(3):309–323 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2025-15-3-309-323.
13. IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Glossary. Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety, Nuclear Security, Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness and Response. 2022. https://doi.org/10.61092/iaea.rrxi-t56z
Review
For citations:
Lobach D.I. On the development of approaches to assessing the state of management in real technical systems. «System analysis and applied information science». 2026;(1):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2026-1-41-47
Views:
430
JATS XML
Email this article 