Preview

Analysis of algorithms for detecting traffic incidents on highways using stationary vehicle detectors

https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2023-4-37-49

Abstract

Incident detection algorithms from an automation point of view can be divided into two categories: automatic and non-automatic incident detection. Automatic algorithms refer to those algorithms that automatically identify an incident based on traffic flow data received from traffic detectors. Manual algorithms or procedures rely on reports from human witnesses. Based on functional characteristics, incident detection algorithms are divided into algorithms for highways and algorithms for street networks. Based on data acquisition methods, incident detection algorithms are divided into three groups: algorithms using data from stationary vehicle detectors (inductive loops, radars, video cameras, etc.); algorithms using mobile sensors (Bluetooth, wi-fi RFID, GPS, Glonass sensors, toll system transponders, etc.). algorithms that use information from drivers (GSM communications, navigation services, Internet applications, etc.). This article discusses algorithms that use data from stationary vehicle detectors. The disadvantages of incident detection algorithms using stationary transport detectors include: the need to install and operate transport detectors (inductive, video, etc.) leads to interference with traffi fl and sometimes to temporary closure of traffic The location of installation of vehicle detectors, the frequency of their installation and the number are critical from the point of view of detecting an incident on a particular section of the highway. However, it is extremely labor and capital-intensive to install stationary detectors along the entire length of the highway. Also, inductive vehicle detectors, which are mainly used to determine the parameters of traffic flow on highways, are unreliable and often fail, which makes it ineffective to detect incidents on a particular section of the road. The advantages of the algorithms under consideration include their proven reliability and accuracy in identifying incidents over decades, which is their undoubted advantage over algorithms that use mobile sensors or information from drivers.

About the Authors

D. V. Navoi
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Minsk


D. V. Kapski
Higher Attestation Commission of the Republic of Belarus
Belarus
Minsk


N. A. Filippova
State Technical University—MADI
Russian Federation
Moscow


I. N. Pugachev
Khabarovsk Federal Research Center of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Khabarovsk 


References

1. Abdulhai, B. and Ritchie, S.G. (1999). “ Enhancing the universality and transferability of freeway incident detection using a Bayesian-based neural network.” Transportation Research Part C. Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 261-280

2. Adeli, H. and Samant, A. (2000). “ An adaptive conjugate gradient neural network-wavelet model for traffic incident detection.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. Vol. 15, No.4, pp. 251.260

3. Ahmed, M.S. and Cook, A.R. (1977). “Analysis of freeway traffic time-series data using Box Jenkins techniques.” Transportation Research Record, No. 722, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 1-9.

4. Ahmed, M.S. and Cook, A.R. (1980). “Time series models for freeway incident detection.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 106, No. 6, ASCE, pp. 731-745.

5. Ahmed, M.S. and Cook, A.R. (1982). “Application of time-series analysis techniques to freeway incident detection.” Transportation Research Board, No. 841, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 19-21.

6. Al-Deek, H.M., Ishak, S.S. and Khan, A.A. (1996). “Impact of freeway geometric and incident characteristics on incident detection.” Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 122, No. 6, ASCE, pp. 440-446.

7. Balke, K.N. (1993). “An evaluation of existing incident detection algorithms.” Research Report, FHWA/TX-93/123220, Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, November 1993.

8. Black, J. and Sreedevi, I. (2001). “ Automatic incident detection algorithms.” ITS DecisionDatabase in PATH, http://www.path.berkeley.edu/~leap/TTM/Incident_Manage/Detection/aida.html, February 2001.

9. Chang, E.C.-P. and Wang, S.-H. (1994). “Improved freeway incident detection using fuzzy set theory.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1453, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 75-82

10. Chen, S., Wang, W., van Zuylen, H., 2009. Construct support vector machine ensemble to detect traffic incident. Expert Systems with Applications 36, рр. 10976-10986.

11. Cheu, R.L. and Ritchie, S.G. (1995). “Automated detection of lane-blocking freeway incidents using artificial neural networks.” Transportation Research Part C. Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 371-388

12. CLIPS Reference Manual, Version 5.1 of CLIPS, Vol. I. Software Technology Branch, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Sept. 1991.

13. CLIPS User's Guide, Version 5.1 of CLIPS, Vol. II. Software Technology Branch, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Sept. 1991.

14. Collins, J.F., Hopkins, C.M. and Martin, J.A. (1979). “ Automatic incident detection ‒ TRRL algorithms HIOCC and PATREG.” TRRL Supplementary Report, No. 526, Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.

15. Dia, H. and Rose, G. (1997). “Development and evaluation of neural network freeway incident detection models using field data.” Transportation Research Part C. Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 313-331

16. Dudek, C.L., Messer, C.J. and Nuckles, N.B. (1974). “Incident detection on urban freeway.” Transportation Research Record, No. 495, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 12-24

17. Fide Tutorial. Aptronix, 1992.

18. Fide Reference Manual. Aptronix, 1992.

19. Jian Lu, Shuyan Chen, Wei Wang, Henk van Zuylen (2011). A hybrid model of partial least squares and neural network for traffic incident detection, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.

20. Hsiao, C.-H., Lin, C.-T. and Cassidy, M. (1994). “Application of fuzzy logic and neural networks to automatically detect freeway traffic incidents.” Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 120, No. 5, ASCE, pp. 753-772

21. Ishak, S.S. and Al-Deek, H.M. (1998). “Fuzzy ART neural network model for automated detection of freeway incidents.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1634, TRB, National ResearchCouncil, pp. 56-63.

22. Levin, M. and Krause, G.M. (1978). “Incident detection: a Bayesian approach.” Transportation Research Record, No. 682, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 52-58.

23. Lin, C.K. and Chang, G.L. (1998). “Development of a fuzzy-expert system for incident detection and classification.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling. Vol. 27, No. 9-11, pp. 9-25.

24. Masters, P.H., Lam, J.K. and Wong, K. (1991). “Incident detection algorithms of COMPASS ‒ an advanced traffic management system.” Proceedings of Vehicle Navigation and InformationSystems Conference, Part 1, SAE, Warrendale, PA, October 1991, pp. 295-310.

25. Marijke, F. A., & Thomas, P. H. (2004). Evolving transfer functions for artificial neural networks. Neural Computation and Application, 13, 38-46.

26. Michalopoulos, P.G. (1991). “Vehicle detection video through image processing: the Autoscope system.” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Vol. 40, No. 1, IEEE, pp. 21-29.

27. Michalopoulos, P.G., Jacobson, R.D., Anderson, C.A. and DeBruycker, T.B. (1993). “Automatic incident detection through video image processing.” Traffic Engineering and Control. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 66-75.

28. Payne, H.J. and Tignor, S.C. (1978). “Freeway incident-detection algorithms based on decision trees with states.” Transportation Research Record. No. 682, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 30-37.

29. Ritchie, S.G. and Cheu, R.L. (1993). “Simulation of freeway incident detection using artificial neural networks.” Transportation Research Part C. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 203-217.

30. Stephanedes, Y.J., Chassiakos, A.P. and Michalopoulos, P.G. (1992). “Comparative performance evaluation of incident detection algorithms.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1360, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 50-57.

31. Stephanedes, Y.J. and Liu, X. (1995). “Artificial neural networks for freeway incident detection.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1494, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 91-97.

32. Subramaniam, S. (1991). “Literature review of incident detection algorithms to initiative diversion strategies.” Working Paper, University Center of Transportation Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

33. Tsai, J. and Case, E.R. (1979). “Development of freeway incident detection algorithms by using patternrecognition techniques.” Transportation Research Record, No. 722, TRB, National Research Council, pp. 113-116.

34. Weil, R., Wootton, J. and Garcia-Ortiz, A. (1998). “Traffic incident detection: sensors and algorithms.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling. Vol. 27, No. 9-11, pp. 257-291.

35. Nikolaev A.B., Yagudaev G.G., Sapego Y.S., Eremin S.V., Kulakov A.V. Analysis incident management algorithms in intelligent transport systems [Electronic resource]. 2017. Vol. 9, no. 4. Access mode: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/16TVN417.pdf (in Russ.)

36. Bottino, A., Garbo, A., Loiacono, C. and Quer, S. (2016). Street viewer: An autonomous vision based traffic tracking system. Sensors, 16(6). doi: 10.3390/s16060813

37. Chassiakos, A. and Stephanedes, Y. (1993a). Smoothing algorithms for incident detection. Transportation Research Record, no. 1394, pp. 8-16.

38. Chung, E. and Rosalion, N. (1999). [Electronic resource] Effective incident detection and management on freeways. Technical Report ARRB Transport Research Ltd. Access mode: https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1164576.

39. CTC & Associates LLC (2012). Automated video incident detection systems: Preliminary investigation. Technical Report Caltrans Division of Research and Innovation. [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.dot.ca.gov/newtech/researchreports/preliminary_investigations/docs/automated_incident_pi.pdf.

40. Dia, H. and Rose, G. (1997). Development and evaluation of neural network freeway incident detection models using field data. Transportation Research, 5C(5), 313-331.

41. Chintalacheruvu, N. and Muthukumar, V. (2012). Video based vehicle detection and its application in intelligent transportation systems. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 2. doi: 10.4236/jtts.2012.24033.

42. Fishbain, B., Ideses, I., Mahalel, D. and Yaroslavsky, L. (2009). Real-time vision-based traffic flow measurements and incident detection. In Real-Time Image and Video Processing 2009, no. 7244 in Proc. SPIE, pages 72440I. doi: 10.1117/12.812976

43. Kastrinaki, V., Zervakis, M. and Kalaitzakis, K. (2003a). A survey of video processing techniques for traffic applications. Image and Vision Computing, 21(4), 359-381. doi: 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00004-0.

44. Luk, J., Han, C. and Chin, D. (2010). [Electronic resource] Automatic freeway incident detection: Review of practices and guidance. In 24th ARRB conference : building on 50 years of road and transport research : proceedings. Access mode: http://railknowledgebank.com/Presto/content/GetDoc.axd?ctID=MjE1ZTI4YzctZjc1YS00MzQ4LTkyY2UtMDJmNTgxYjg2ZDA5&rID=NTY=&pID=MTQ3Ng==&attchmnt=VHJ1ZQ==&uSesDM=False&rIdx=NzgyNA==&rCFU=.

45. Martin, P. T., Perrin, J. and Hansen, B. (2001). [Electronic resource] Incident detection algorithm evaluation. Technical Report Utah Deportment of Transportation. Access mode: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.569.5951&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

46. Loureiro, P.F.Q., Rossetti, R.J.F. and Braga, R.A.M. (2009). Video processing techniques for traffic information acquisition using uncontrolled video streams. In ITSC ’09. 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems . doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2009.5309595

47. Netten, B., Weekley, J., Miles, A., Nitsche, P. and Baan, J. et al. (2013b). [Electronic resource] RAIDER – realising advanced incident detection on european roads: Generic specifications for incident detection systems. Technical Report ERA-NET ROAD. Access mode: http://www.cedr.eu/download/other_public_files/research_programme/eranet_road/call_2011/mobility/ raider/02_raider-d4_1 _genericspecificationsforincidentdetectionsystems_v5.pdf

48. Li, Q., fu Shao, C. and Zhao, Y. (2014). A robust system for real-time pedestrian detection and tracking. J. Cent. South Univ., 21, 1643-1653. doi: 10.1007/s11771-014-2106-1

49. Mehboob, F., Abbas, M. and Jiang, R. (2016). Traffic event detection from road surveillance vide os based on fuzzy logic. In 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), pp. 188-194. doi: 10.1109/SAI.2016.7555981

50. Nathanail, E., Kouros, P. and Kopelias, P. (2017). Traffic volume responsive incident detection. Transportation Research Procedia, 25(Supplement C), 1755-1768. World Conference on Transport Research -WCTR 2016 Shanghai. 10-15 July 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.136

51. Porikli, F. and A. Yilmaz. Object detection and tracking, in Video Analytics for Business Intelligence. 2012, Springer.

52. Ren, J. (2016). Detecting and positioning of traffic incidents via video-based analysis of traffic states in a road segment. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 10, 428-437(9).

53. Ritchie, S. and Cheu, R. (1993). Simulation of freeway incident detection using artificial neural networks. Transportation Research, 1C(3), 203-217.

54. Shukla, A. and M. Saini. “Moving Object Tracking of Vehicle Detection”: A Concise Review. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2015.

55. Shahade, A.K. and G.Y. Patil. Efficient Background Subtraction and Shadow Removal Technique for Multiple Human object Tracking. International Journal, 2013.

56. Vasu, L. Effective Step to Real-time Implementation of Accident Detection System Using Image Processing. 2010.

57. Vinay, D. and N.L. Kumar. Object Tracking Using Background Subtraction Algorithm. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 2015.

58. Wan, Y., Huang, Y. and Buckles, B. (2014). Camera calibration and vehicle tracking: Highway traffic video analytics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 44, 202-213. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.018

59. Zhang, W., Q.J. Wu, and H. Bing Yin. Moving vehicles detection based on adaptive motion histogram. Digital Signal Processing, 2010.

60. Kapsky D.V., Kot E.N., Bogdanovich S.V. [et al.] Basics of automation of intelligent transport systems. Vologda: Infra-Engineering Publ., 2022, 412 p. (in Russ.)

61. Skirkovsky S.V., Kapsky D.V., Navoi D.V. Theoretical and practical approaches to the creation and development of an intelligent city transport system. Gomel: "BelGUT", 2022, 171 с. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Navoi D.V., Kapski D.V., Filippova N.A., Pugachev I.N. Analysis of algorithms for detecting traffic incidents on highways using stationary vehicle detectors. «System analysis and applied information science». 2023;(4):37-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2023-4-37-49

Views: 297


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-4923 (Print)
ISSN 2414-0481 (Online)