Decision synthesis in engineering design of technological attachment
https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2021-2-47-53
Abstract
Synthesis of the engineering design decisions is considered. The fixtures for locating and clamping parts to be tooled at the manufacturing operations are the design objects. An approach to topology and parametric design are proposed. Most efficiently these tasks are solved at the function level. Finally, geometry models and design drawings are needed for manufacturing. Fixture action is to mate bases of fixture object with function faces of fixture locators. This is constraining the degrees of freedom of object. Every base constrains certain degree of freedom. In accordance with quantity and quality of that degrees, certain locators are appointed to the base and them must be positioned resulting in the a locating chart. The quality of the locating chart may be evaluated by the several criteria, for example, by it dimensions. Unsatisfactory solution may be followed by redistributing degrees of freedom among the bases or editing positions of locators within the bases. Thus the design is decomposed onto two independent tasks of different levels.
About the Authors
D. P. KunkevichBelarus
Kunkevich Dmitry, PhD, associate Professor of the Department of Software for Information technologies and systems
Minsk
I. L. Kovaleva
Belarus
Irina L. Kovaleva PhD, associate Professor of the Department of Software for Information technologies and systems
Minsk
A. A. Baryshau
Belarus
Baryshau Artsiom, master of Science in Engineering, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Software for Information technologies and systems
Minsk
References
1. Norenkov I.P. “Avtomatizirovannoe proektirovanie”, 2002. – URL: http://window.edu.ru/resource/981/23981/files/cad.pdf (data obrashhenija 1.08.2020).
2. Polovinkin A. I. Osnovy inzhenernogo tvorchestva: Ucheb.posobie dlja stu-dentov vtuzov. – M.: Mashinostroenie, 1988. 368s.
3. Krotjuk Ju. M., Grivachevskij A. G. Unificirovannye modeli i metod avto-matizirovannogo proektirovanija instrumenta dlja poperechno-klinovoj prokat-ki. Informatika. 2010; (2(26)):94-104.
4. Levin G. M. Programmnyj kompleks dlja avanproektirovanija agregatnogo oborudovanija dlja gruppovoj obrabotki / N.N. Gushhinskij, G. M. Levin, B. M. Ro-zin, D. P. Kunkevich // Avtomatizacija tehnologicheskih processov proizvodstv: Materialy respublikanskogo nauchno-tehnicheskogo seminara Minsk, 14 marta 2012g., Minsk: «Minskjekspo», 2012, s. 8–9.
5. Grivachevskij A. G., Prohvatkin N. V. Modelirovanie i avtomatizacija kon-struirovanija shtampov. – Minsk: Nauka i tehnika, 1986. – 197 s.
6. Rakovich A. G. Osnovy avtomatizacii proektirovanija tehnologicheskih pri-sposoblenij. – Mn.: Nauka i tehnika, 1985. – 285 s.
7. Bazirovanie i bazy v mashinostroenii. Terminy i opredelenija GOST 21495-76 M.: Izdatel’stvo standartov, 1990.
8. Obrabotka metallov rezaniem: spravochnik tehnologa / Pod. red. A.A. Panova. – M.: Mashinostroenie. 1988. – 736 s.
9. Kalenik M. V., Kovaleva I. L., Kunkevich D. P. Opredelenie polozhenija opor v prisposoblenii // Informacionnye tehnologii i sistemy: problemy, metody, reshenija (ITS – 2018): sb. materialov Respublikanskoj nauchno-tehnicheskoj konferencii, Minsk 22–23 nojabrja 2018 g. / redkol.: S. V. Haritonchik [i dr.]. – Minsk: Chetyre chetverti, 2019.
10. Kunkevich D. P., Polozkov Ju. V., Baryshev A.A. Avtomatizirovannyj sintez konstrukcij tehnologicheskih prisposoblenij. «Sistemnyj analiz i prikladnaja informatika». 2019;(4):39-45. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309–4923–2019–4–39–45.
Review
For citations:
Kunkevich D.P., Kovaleva I.L., Baryshau A.A. Decision synthesis in engineering design of technological attachment. «System analysis and applied information science». 2021;(2):47-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2021-2-47-53