A selection mechanism using multi-criteria evaluation and hierarhical classifying tree for resume data processing
https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2021-2-34-38
Abstract
The paper considers a problem of optimal feature selection for resume data processing by means of combining multicriteria evaluation technique and hierarhical classifying trees technology what makes it possible to build a selection mechanism without necessity to collect data for the learning purposes of real applicants. Instead, the learning data are generated by means of the technique used in a full factorial experiment with quite a restricted number of samples. The suggested approach minimizes the number of the features used in selection the best candidates and does not use the quantitative ratings of candidates replacing them with multi-phases classifying procedure. These peculiarities of the suggested selection mechanism make it more flexible and form a basis for applying it in conditions characterized by vagueness and fuzziness of the applicant data.
About the Authors
O. V. German
Belarussian State University of Indormatics and Radioelectronics
Belarus
Belarus
Oleg German got PhD in computer science
Minsk
J. O. German
Belarussian State University of Indormatics and Radioelectronics
Belarus
Belarus
Julia German got PhD in computer science
Minsk
S. Nasr
Belarussian State University of Indormatics and Radioelectronics
Belarus
Belarus
Sara Nasr PhD
Minsk
References
1. Sneha Kumari, Punam Giri. Automated Resume Extraction and candidate Selection System. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (IJRET). 2014., vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 206–208.
2. Taleo. Applicant tracking system. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.applicanttrackingsystems.net/oracle-taleo/. Access date: 11.02.2021.
3. GreenHouse ATS: what job-seekers need to know. [Electronic resource]. –Access mode: https://www.jobscan.co/blog/greenhouse-ats-what-job-seekers-need-to-know/. – Access date: 11.02.2021.
4. Tzeng G.-H., Huang J. J. Multipple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Chapman and Hall. 2011. vol.166., 349 p.
5. Sudrajat R., Irianingsih I., Krisnawan D. Analysis of data mining classification by comparison of C4.5 and ID algorithms. IOP Conference Series: Materials and Engineering. 2017. vol. 166. pp. 12–31.
6. German, O. V., Nasr S. New method for optimal feature set reduction. Informatics and automation. SPIRAS Proceedings (St. Petersburg, Russia). 2020. vol. 19, № 6. pp. 1198–1221.
7. Saaty T. L., Vargas L. G. Decision making with the analytic Network Process. Springer. 2013. – 370 p.
8. Urbanovicz R. J., Meeker M., Cava V. L. et al. Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2018., vol. 85, pp. 189–203.
9. Vens C., Stryif J., Shietgat L. et al. Decision trees for hierarchical multi-label classification. Machine Learning. 2008. vol. 73., № 2. pp. 185–214.
10. German J. O. One version of the group resolution principle for discrete optimization. Proc. of Intern. conf. Information Technologies and Systems (ITS) 2020. Minsk, BSUIR, 2020, pp. 165–167.
11. Capraro A., Fischetti M. A heuristic method for the set covering problem. Operations Research. 2000. vol. 47., № 5.
Review
For citations:
German O.V., German J.O., Nasr S. A selection mechanism using multi-criteria evaluation and hierarhical classifying tree for resume data processing. «System analysis and applied information science». 2021;(2):34-38. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-4923-2021-2-34-38
Views:
1991
Email this article 